Видео

great presentation in this video

Loved this chat. Thanks, Celia!!

you try to compare a geo metro to a Cadillac it's all depends what you want to film.. personally i would not spend 35000$ for a camera.. i will never ever would get my money back.. but if anybody buying that kind they not buying it because they want they money back.. they buy it because that what they want or hopefully that is what they need.

📸

Great interview! I learned some things even I didn’t know. Just for the record my favorite song of Samuel’s is Angry Break Up song but he has a lot of great ones! 🎶

if your vlogging then the cheapo cameras fine as its a lot smaller and easier to use! but i defo wouldn't try dropping a 4 grand camera on the floor due to the fact it felt sturdy! truth be told you'd probably get away with dropping the cheaper camera more than the dearer cannon!

Looks like I've got the same cheap DVR as you and definitely have the exact same tripod. What I don't like about the cheap camera is there a green bias when using the camera itself. Connecting that camera to a HDMI cable and USB video card produces strange results. On an old HP laptop with AMD chip, the result will be similarly disappointing. Putting the same setup on a HP laptop with a Rizen 5 processor and the results are much improved. Same camera, three different results. The microphone that comes with the camera is e-waste. Absolute junk.

What camera are you using to film all of this because it looks way better than either of those

🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼

I loved this🔥🤘🔥

This was hands down one of the best interviews I've ever been a part of! Celia truly is a gem and we're grateful for all of the opportunities she's given us. Looking forward to the next one! Thanks again for everything 🔥🤘🏼

If you are a professional user then getting a top of the line camcorder is important but if you are a complete amateur then you could get away with starting out with a 100 Dollar camcorder but may wish to get a slightly better one later on but for most amateurs spending between 300 to 500 dollars on a product that you may only use 3 to 4 times a year can work out to be an expensive outlay so budget ones become more appealing even though they are designed for very basic short films and still shots

I'm a Canon person. I have 5 Canon vixia HV 40's. I do have some cheapy camers but I really like the vixia best.

Love that transition! 😂❤

An absolute pleasure ma’am! Well done! 😊

wow cool

Congrats on the interview! Love the outfit 🤩

Wow. 2013 was wild in retrospective.

Amen to that! 19:44

Great conversation 🎉

Such a cool insight into your life and music!! ❤

I am here because Elon talked about Vine so I wanted to see what it is.

Here after Elon Musk's poll on bringing back vine on twitter

I'm here today 😀 April 17 2024 After Elon musk Twitted about bringing back Vine . Nice video

Good advice

This is such a good loop even if it's unintentional

6:33 This also represents the faces of the people who bought the DVC Camcorder vs the Canon XF405 lol Going by the logic of "a mom or day show up to a baseball game with" you're still better off getting the Canon XF405 for your child's baseball game. If you want to able to preserve your memories as a family for baseball games or something else invest in a better camera. It doesn't have to be the $3K camera either. The Canon Vixia camcorders have served me well. The Canon Vixia HF G20 is a 1080 HD camera that I've used in multiple environments including a snowstorm and it worked out well. You can see some of it on my RUclips channel like with the short film "Under Siege" I did. There are camcorders you can get for around the $500 - $1,000 that are also better than the $100 camcorder while also not breaking the bank either. There's also a site I came called nj accessory . com with the tagline buy direct & save. They offer monthly payment plans so that maybe able to help with affording some of these cameras to. Just to clarify I have not used the site yet, but I may use that site to get something like the Canon XF405 since I couldn't afford to pay for that directly. I had the chance to use the XF400 in film school and film the Chicago Marathon with it and I'm grateful I had the opportunity. I'm also interested in the Sony FDR - AX53 which is just under $1,000 but have seen good videos for. Up to you what camera you end up getting. I've read some comments and while it's true that camcorder tech has improved from over a decade ago even for a cheap camcorder part one of the selling points of a camcorder is being able to zoom within the body itself. The DVC Camcorder shows some issues when you try to zoom in. If you do get something like that DVC Camcorder you may have to just use without the zoom feature and on a steady tripod. Just my opinion here, but I'd only get something like that $100 camcorder if I was doing a review like they're doing here or as part of some kind of filmmaker challenge video where you have to create a short film on something like this and have other teams use the same camera. While they offer their commentary. And show final results. But if you're able to save money it maybe worth waiting to get something closer to $1,000 to start off on. If not that's ok to. As a wide show it doesn't look bad under certain lighting conditions. For this review video I also think a camcorder ranging from around $500 - $1,000 would have been a better comparison.

Its a strange, frustrating, and occasional amazing thing Personally, helped to just accept that its going to be slow Either that or to just try to finish things no matter how much i like the idea And then revise it a long time later Have a nice day

Lmao

Thank you so much for the opportunity! I had an amazing time.

👌

Patetica....

Thank you so much for this interview. I had a great time talking with you and I am so thankful for all the work you do putting together the playlists and the interviews!!

We love flann. ❤ Great interview Celia!

Such a great talk!! 🤘🤘

THANKS FOR THE OPPORTUNITY!!!

Love you Celia!!! ❤

Loved this. I resonate with so much of it - especially about constraints and deadlines being gifts. Took a while to learn that 😅

yeah but when the shot is a handheld DSLR shot vertically... and their is no lighting control. sorry I think they didnt show the shot for a reason.

You know we do actually like to see the shot right? Preferably in the same clip

E

I know where you're at!!!

Running a label and movement called #WEATNU since 2014, and seeing someone doing this is very surprising, you are doing good for artists. Thank you for adding Oracle to your playlist.

Nice 😊

Ummm...ummm...I have to work on my ummms. But thank you so much for this interview Celia!

I had such a cold that week. Trying to do an interview. Lol😂

It all depends on what you can afford. Obviously the $3,000 Canon produces better footage and has more features. But, if all you can afford is $100, then the $100 camera looks really good RESPECT! ✊🏾

Celia you are so much fun! Thanks for interviewing me! Much love Taurus sister!

.

One thing comes through about the difference between the expensive Canon camcorder and the cheap generic Chinese camcorder is the exposure control the Canon has good exposure control where as the cheap generic Chinese camcorder obviously has little to no exposure control as the commentator said you get what you pay .There is one thing good about these cheap Chinese genetic camera's they offer consumers a choice of new affordable camera's where as before they either had to use their phones which the majority of people would do today or if people couldn't afford an expensive camera they had to buy second hand. The Japanese have largely abandoned the cheap affordable end of the camera market to the Chinese camera companies mainly because of smart phones, the quality of most Chinese made camera's probably ain't that great but give it time they will learn and catch up to the Japanese camera companies.